The Future of Search

OpenAI recently announced they’re working on a new product called SearchGPT. It’s currently in prototype, and there is a waitlist to get into an eventual beta. This looks very similar to what Perplexity is doing: using artificial intelligence tools to conduct web searches in response to your questions and providing you, instead of a collection of links, a simple answer with links to the resources and justification for the answer.

I was invested in Perplexity until it became apparent they were scraping parts of the web without anybody’s permission. That doesn’t change the fact that this type of service, done right, is superior to traditional search. I think it is only a matter of time before most of us search this way.

Of course, OpenAI is getting in on the action. Google is already trying the same thing. At this point, the race is on to provide this new method of getting answers out of the internet faster and more accurately. I don’t know who will make the best version of this widget, but I sure hope it is a horse race. When Google emerged as the search engine triumphant, we stopped getting real competition for decades.

I bring this up partly because of the recent antitrust ruling against Google. I’ve heard from several readers asking if Apple will create its own search engine if they’re no longer allowed to make that sweet deal with Google. I don’t think so.

Search engines are yesterday’s news. If I had to bet a nickel, though, Apple will ultimately partner with AI Search engines the same way it is now partnering with Large Language Models companies.

Apple could try to build its own AI search technology, but from the outside, it looks like it’s not far enough along to make anything competitive with the work being done by others. Also, even if Apple could make something equal to or better than other AI Search technologies, using it exclusively would likely land it in regulatory hot water.

Farewell, Apple SuperDrive

Felipe Esposito wrote on 9to5Mac that it is no longer possible to buy the Apple SuperDrive through the Apple Store in the United States. While there has been no official announcement, it appears that Apple is selling out existing stock with no intention of making any more. The SuperDrive is a USB CD and DVD player that you can connect to your Mac with a USB-A port. Back in the day, they were essential with operating system and software were issued on CD.

apple superdrive hardware device that reads and writes CDs and DVDs
Image: Evan-Amos

I have one in a drawer that I use infrequently. Just recently, I bought some Jamey Aebersold music books that came with accompanying tracks on CD. Using my SuperDrive, I installed the tracks into Apple Music and made them available for my next practice session.

While I understand that Apple feels it’s time to discontinue this 2008 product, I’m still a little sad. I bought mine around 2010, and now I’m just hoping I can get another 14 years out of it.

More Vision Pro Environments, Please

I frequently use environments in Vision Pro, which is one of the device’s best features. They can give you a context shift that is only possible with Vision Pro. I wish there were more of them.

Related to this, the Disney+ application got a nice addition with a new immersive environment in Iceland which was created by National Geographic, one of the Disney companies. It looks fantastic inside Vision Pro and again raises the question of why these environments are all bottled up inside individual applications. Apple needs to release more system-wide environments. I expect these app-based environments are similar enough to system-wide environments that we could have some donation-based system where I could use Disney’s Iceland outside the Disney+ application.

Of course, this would require some work on Apple’s part and agreement on the part of the app developers, but why wouldn’t they? If there is a technical limitation preventing this, my advice to Apple is to solve it. If there is a pride limitation on allowing third-party applications to donate environments, I advise Apple to get over it.

I know for a fact Apple has at least one middle-aged user who would love nothing better than to work in Apple Notes while sitting in the driver’s seat of his virtual Landspeeder. Why not bring him a little joy?

On the Plastic Apple Watch SE

There is a rumor afloat that the next Apple Watch SE will be made of plastic. Mark Gurman recently stated that Apple using rigid plastic in the Apple Watch SE is “increasingly likely.” I think this is a good idea for several reasons:

  • Hopefully, it would allow them to lower the price. Lower prices should equal more Apple Watches on wrists. The Apple Watch is an excellent device. Not only does it tell you the time, but it could save your life. Whether you’re in a crash, suffer a fall, or develop a bad ticker, the Apple Watch is there for you.
  • Second, plastic would hopefully give them more options regarding colors. Apple, the company that brought us the Bondi Blue iMac has been off its game lately regarding product colors. Maybe plastic would allow them to be a little more experimental.
  • Finally, it would be a lot lighter. Lately, I’ve been making a real effort to wear my Apple Watch Ultra while I sleep, and I notice the weight. Granted, I’ve the heaviest of Apple Watches. But there is a market for people who prefer a lighter wristwatch.

The internal argument against a plastic watch would be that Apple doesn’t make things out of plastic. Hopefully, the powers that be see that Apple should make things out of whatever materials make the most sense for the product. And in the case of the Apple Watch SE, a plastic watch makes a ton of sense.